Natural Resources Governance

Natural Resources Governance

Designing a Cultural-Social Paradigmatic Model for Sustainable Urban Development in Deteriorated Fabrics (Case Study: Districts 17 and 18 of Tehran)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Sajjad Ghasemzadeh 1
Kamal Javanmard 2
Mehrdad Navabakhsh 1
1 Department of Cultural Sociology, Islamic Azad University, Kish Branch, Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of Sociology, Qods City Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
10.22059/jnrg.2025.404446.1061
Abstract
Sustainable urban development in contemporary societies is a multidimensional concept that, beyond improving physical infrastructure, emphasizes the revitalization of cultural identities and the strengthening of social bonds. In megacities such as Tehran, deteriorated urban fabrics—characterized by physical decay, weakened social capital, and eroded local identity—pose significant challenges to achieving this goal. Traditional regeneration approaches, which primarily focus on physical interventions, have often proven ineffective and have exacerbated social inequalities. Rooted in cultural sociology, this study aims to design a cultural-social paradigmatic model for sustainable urban regeneration in Tehran's Districts 17 and 18. The central research question explores how cultural structures (values, beliefs, norms) and social structures (patterns of relationships and interactions) can form the basis of a systematic framework for regeneration. The methodology is mixed (quantitative-qualitative), applied, and descriptive-analytical. Data were collected through 145 structured questionnaires with acceptable reliability (α = 0.82) and 20 semi-structured interviews, analyzed using CFA, SEM, multiple regression, and thematic analysis. Findings indicate that cultural (β = 0.38) and social (β = 0.45) structures have a significant positive impact on sustainable development. The proposed model, with an explanatory power of 72% and a validation rate of 87%, highlights the interplay between cultural norms, social networks, and institutional policies. The study's innovation lies in localizing key theories and conducting comparative analysis with global cases. The results underscore the need for participatory policymaking, cultural identity reinforcement, and social investment to enhance quality of life.
Keywords
Cultural Structures
Dilapidated Tissue
Social Structures
Sustainable Urban Development
Urban Regeneration
Afsari Bajestani, S., & Ranjbar, E. (2024). Culture-led regeneration in historical and cultural areas: The case of a historical quarter in Mashhad, Iran. Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.4551
Agyeman, J., Bullard, R. D., & Evans, B. (Eds.). (2003). Just sustainabilities: Development in an unequal world. MIT Press.
Ali Zadeh Kafshani, Z. (2024). Examining the process and paradigms of planning in urban arenas. Journal of Geography, Civil Engineering, and Urban Management Studies, 8(1).
Amin, A. (2006). The good city. Urban Studies, 43(5–6), 1009–1023. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980600676717
Andersen, N. (2013). The urban community: A world perspective. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203717363
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
Burke, P. (2009). Cultural hybridity. Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780745646978
Culture-led regeneration: Social resilience in urban areas. (2017). International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management. https://doi.org/10.22059/IJHCUM.2017.239707.1002
Dehghan Rik Abadi, K., & Farahani, M. (2021). Evaluation of the consequences of large-scale urban interventions in historical contexts with emphasis on economic effects (Case study: The immediate vicinity of the Saheb ol-Amr Complex in Tabriz). Journal of Islamic Architecture and Urbanism Culture, 6(1), 115–137.
Durkheim, E. (1984). The division of labor in society (W. D. Halls, Trans.). Simon & Schuster.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2007). Policy and planning for large-infrastructure projects. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34(4), 578–597. https://doi.org/10.1068/b32111
Forrest, R., & Kearns, A. (2001). Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2125–2143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120087081
Habibi, S. M., & Moqsoodi, M. (2002). Memari shahri [Urban restoration]. University of Tehran Press.
Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226774497.001.0001
Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, 23–40.
Hayden, D. (1997). The power of place: Urban landscapes as public history. MIT Press.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House.
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
Lees, L., Slater, T., & Wyly, E. (2008). Gentrification. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203940877
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Blackwell.
Natural Resources Governance
Volume 3, Issue 2
Spring 2026
Pages 97-120