Reassessing the Fair Water Distribution Law through the Lens of Water Governance

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Applied Geology, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The water crisis in Iran is less a climatic phenomenon and more a consequence of structural, institutional, and legal inefficiencies. The primary objective of this research is to conduct a critical analysis of the "Fair Water Distribution Law" (1983) through the lens of modern governance indicators, examining the role of legal centralization in aquifer imbalance and the emergence of "regulatory capture." Using a qualitative, descriptive-analytical approach, this study aligns the 1983 Law with the OECD’s 12 Principles on Water Governance and the UNDP framework across institutional, socio-economic, and technical dimensions. Findings reveal that by transforming water from a shared social asset into a "state commodity," the 1983 Law led to the exclusion of local communities and the erosion of indigenous knowledge. Furthermore, the institutional disconnect between allocation and distribution agencies, coupled with regulatory capture by influential interest groups, has severely hindered Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM). The conflict between the 1983 Law and the 2010 "Law for Determining the Status of Unauthorized Wells" is identified as a critical factor neutralizing aquifer-balancing policies. The results assert that the current top-down management model has lost its efficacy in the face of complex socio-ecological crises. To overcome this deadlock, Iran’s water governance must transition toward a polycentric and multi-level model. This transition requires structural reforms, including: drafting a "Comprehensive Water Law" based on the Public Trust Doctrine, institutionalizing basin-based management, legally prioritizing ecological water rights, and restoring legitimacy through genuine stakeholder participation in high-level decision-making.
 
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The water resource crisis in Iran, manifested by a drastic decline in groundwater levels, catastrophic land subsidence, and systemic degradation of water quality, is more than a climatic phenomenon; it reflects profound structural and legal inefficiencies. Population growth and rising demands for food security have exerted unprecedented pressure on strategic reserves, transforming the negative water balance of aquifers into a civilizational threat. The primary objective of this research is to conduct a critical analysis of the "Fair Water Distribution Law" (1983)—the backbone of Iran’s water legal system—through the lens of modern governance indicators. This study examines how legal centralization and the erosion of customary property rights have led to aquifer imbalance and "regulatory capture." A central aim is to analyze the conflicts between this law and subsequent legislation, particularly the "Law for Determining the Status of Unauthorized Wells" (2010), while providing a strategic roadmap for transitioning from state-centric, command-and-control management toward a polycentric, participatory, and adaptive governance model to ensure procedural justice and intergenerational sustainability.
 
Method
This qualitative research employs a descriptive-analytical and critical approach. The methodological logic involves aligning the key provisions of the 1983 Law with two international frameworks: the OECD’s "12 Principles on Water Governance" (focusing on efficiency, role clarity, and transparency) and the UNDP’s "Water Governance Framework" (emphasizing procedural justice and stakeholder participation). Key articles of the law were extracted to analyze their legal philosophy. Subsequently, legal challenges were categorized into three axes: institutional-structural, socio-political/economic, and informational-technical barriers. Finally, using a comparative method, Iran’s status was evaluated against successful global models in France (basin-based management), South Africa (ecological prioritization), and Spain (stakeholder participation). By utilizing content analysis of legal documents and parliamentary records, the research identifies the critical gaps between the 1983 legislative intent and the socio-ecological realities of the 2020s.were carried out using Python software.
 
Findings
The findings indicate that the 1983 Law shifted the management paradigm from "private ownership" to "public commons" (Anfal). However, in practice, it transformed water into a "state commodity" under exclusive bureaucratic management. Under Articles 1 and 18, customary rights were replaced by temporary "reasonable use permits" supervised by the Ministry of Energy. While initiated under the banner of distributive justice, this approach reduced management to absolute administrative control, excluding local participation and eroding indigenous knowledge. Institutionally, a severe disconnect exists between allocation agencies (Ministry of Energy) and distribution agencies (Ministry of Agriculture), hindering Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) at the hydrological scale. Furthermore, "regulatory capture" has allowed influential interest groups to steer decisions toward short-term socio-economic interests at the expense of ecological sustainability. A lack of data transparency and deterrent penalties have brought groundwater abstraction control to a deadlock. The conflict between the 1983 Law and the 2010 Law for Unauthorized Wells is a critical finding, demonstrating how the legalization of illegal extractions has neutralized balancing policies. Moreover, the contradiction between users' "vested rights" and the state's authority to adjust permits has resulted in conflicting judicial rulings. At the implementation level, the law lacks mechanisms for conflict resolution between upstream and downstream users, while the state’s decision-making monopoly has created a profound trust deficit between the government and local farmers.
 
Conclusion
The research concludes that the centralized, top-down model has lost its efficacy in the face of complex socio-ecological crises. The 1983 Law is no longer compatible with Iran's water-scarce landscape. To overcome the current deadlock, Iran’s water governance must transition from state-centrism toward "polycentric and multi-level governance." This research proposes a roadmap for structural reform in four key areas: First, drafting a "Comprehensive Water Law" based on the Public Trust Doctrine, where the state acts as a trustee rather than an owner. Second, institutionalizing basin-based management to align decision-making with hydrological boundaries rather than political ones, ensuring cross-sectoral coordination. Third, legal prioritization of "ecological water rights" as a non-negotiable entity to ensure environmental flows. Fourth, restoring legitimacy by integrating customary knowledge and genuine stakeholder participation. Transitioning to a rights-based approach that integrates socio-economic incentives with ecological constraints is the only way to ensure intergenerational justice. The state must decentralize power and recognize "local water councils" to bridge the trust gap. Without this fundamental shift in the legal paradigm, the enforcement of water permits will remain a technical impossibility. The survival of Iran's water heritage depends on a participatory model where the state, private sector, and local communities share responsibility and accountability for conservation.
 
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors’ Contributions: All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed collaboratively. All authors contributed to writing the manuscript and approved the final version.
 
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
The author(s) declare that there are no acknowledgments.
 
 

Keywords

References

Ahmadi, S., & Badisar, S. (2017). The right to water in international human rights system. Environmental Law, 1(1), 38–50.
Akhmouch, A., & Clavreul, D. (2017). Towards inclusive water governance: OECD evidence and key principles of stakeholder engagement in improving water governance. In Stakeholder engagement for inclusive water governance (pp. 37–59). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43350-9_3
Barraqué, B. (2012). Return of drinking water supply in Paris to public control. Water Policy, 14(6), 903–914. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2012.143
Bartram, J., & Cronk, R. (2015). Vulnerability assessment for loss of access to drinking water due to extreme weather events. Climatic Change, 133(4), 665–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1483-5
Bauer, C. J. (1998). Against the current: Privatization, water markets, and the state in Chile. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Boelens, R., Perreault, T., & Vos, J. (Eds.). (2018). Water justice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316835798
Canelas de Castro, P. (2011). The evolution of international water law. In Sustainable development of the theory and practice of the law of international watercourses (pp. 15–32). WIT Press.
Castro, J. E. (2007). Water governance in the twenty-first century. Ambiente & Sociedade, 10(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-753X2007000200007
Cherrabi El Alaoui, S. (2011). Traditional and modern water management in the Tafilalet region: The case of the Ghorfa. In S. Bogdanovic (Ed.), Water policy and law in the Mediterranean: An evolving nexus (pp. 123–134). UNESCO.
Cuadrado-Quesada, G. (2022). Governing groundwater: Between law and practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92778-3
Cuadrado-Quesada, G., & Gupta, J. (2019). Participation in groundwater governance: Outlining a path to inclusive development. Water Policy, 21(5), 1050–1064. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2019.142
Cuadrado-Quesada, G., Gupta, J., & Mirumachi, N. (2016). Ruling T-622/16. European Court of Justice.
Doshi, S. (2007). Imperial water, urban crisis: A political ecology of colonial state formation in Bombay, 1850–1890. Review: Journal of the Fernand Braudel Center, 30(3), 195–226.
Environment Protection Authority. (2017). Environment Protection Act 2017. Victorian Government.
Falkenmark, M., & Wang-Erlandsson, L. (2021). A water-function-based framework for understanding and governing water resilience in the Anthropocene. One Earth, 4(2), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.01.009
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2013). Water accounting for water governance and sustainable development. FAO.
Folke, C., Biggs, R., Norström, A. V., Reyers, B., & Rockström, J. (2016). Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecology and Society, 21(3), Article 41. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08771-210341
Garrick, D., Iseman, T., Gilson, G., Brozović, N., O’Donnell, E., Matthews, N., Miralles-Wilhelm, F., Wight, C., & Young, W. (2017). Valuing water for sustainable development. Science, 358(6366), 1003–1005. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam8700
Gupta, J., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2013). Global water governance in the context of global and multilevel governance: Its need, form, and challenges. Ecology and Society, 18(4), Article 53. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05952-180453
GWP Technical Advisory Committee. (2000). Integrated water resources management. Global Water Partnership.
Hall, D., Lobina, E., & Terhorst, P. (2013). Re-municipalisation in the early twenty-first century: Water in France and energy in Germany. International Review of Applied Economics, 27(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2012.754507
Hanasaki, N., Kanae, S., Oki, T., Masuda, K., Motoya, K., Shirakawa, N., Shen, Y., & Tanaka, K. (2008). An integrated model for the assessment of global water resources—Part 1: Model description and input data. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 12(4), 1007–1026. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-12-1007-2008
Hooper, B., & Lankford, B. (2018). Unintended water allocation: Gaining share from indirect subsidy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 139, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.08.004
Hrachowitz, M., & Clark, M. P. (2017). HESS opinions: The complementary merits of competing modelling philosophies in hydrology. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21(9), 3953–3973. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3953-2017
InnWater. (2025). D2.2: Advancing water governance: Reference guide for programming. EU Horizon InnWater Project.
Kahrizi, M., Kasiri, N., Mohammadi, T., & Zhao, S. (2014). Introducing sorption coefficient through extended UNIQUAC and Flory-Huggins models for improved flux prediction in forward osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science, 474, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.09.039
Kanazawa, M. (1998). Efficiency in western water law: The development of the California doctrine, 1850–1911. The Journal of Legal Studies, 27(1), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1086/468021
Kidd, M. (2016). Compulsory licensing under South Africa’s National Water Act. Water International, 41(6), 916–927. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2016.1138401
Larson, A. M., Sarmiento Barletti, J. P., & Gálvez, E. (2019). The role of multi-stakeholder forums in subnational jurisdictions: Framing literature review for in-depth field research (CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 190). CIFOR. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/007381
Maass, A., & Anderson, R. L. (1978). And the desert shall rejoice: Conflict, growth and justice in arid environments. MIT Press.
Martínez-Fuentes, G., & Pattyn, V. (2011). Autonomization of drinking water management supply? The Tunisian experience. In S. Bogdanovic (Ed.), Water policy and law in the Mediterranean: An evolving nexus (pp. 145–156). UNESCO.
Moschell, L. (2024). Governing the right to water. Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law & Policy, 29(1), 1–25.
Murray, J., Reynolds, S., Holden, P., & Van De Werfhorst, L. (2011). Canine scent and microbial source tracking in Santa Barbara, CA: Pathogens and pathogen indicators. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 13(8), 2015–2022. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1EM10162A
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). Water governance in the Netherlands: Fit for the future? OECD Studies on Water. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264102637-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). OECD principles on water governance. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239326-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017). Water quality modelling, monitoring and management. OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Implementing the OECD principles on water governance: Indicator framework and self-assessment tool. OECD Studies on Water. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264292659-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Water science, policy, and management: A global challenge. Wiley.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). A handbook of what works. OECD iLibrary.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024a). The economics of water scarcity (OECD Environment Working Papers No. 245). https://doi.org/10.1787/06943700-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024b). Lack of trust in institutions and political engagement: An analysis based on the 2021 OECD Trust Survey (OECD Working Papers on Public Governance No. 64). https://doi.org/10.1787/83351a47-en
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2015). Water governance in the face of global change: From understanding to transformation. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21855-7
Pisani, D. J. (2002). Water and American government: The Reclamation Bureau, national water policy, and the West, 1902–1935. University of California Press.
Poupeau, F. (2022). The field of water policy: Power and scarcity in the American Southwest. Routledge.
Poupeau, F., Coeurdray, M., Cortinas, J., & O’Neill, B. F. (2016). The making of water policy. In Water bankruptcy in the land of plenty (pp. 101–118). CRC Press.
Prieto, M., Calderón, M., & Fragkou, M. (2020). Water policy and management in Chile. In The Wiley encyclopedia of water: Science, technology, and society (pp. 2589–2600). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118889157.ch3
Raworth, K. (2012). A safe and just space for humanity: Can we live within the doughnut? Oxfam Discussion Papers.
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., III, Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C. A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P. K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., … Foley, J. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a
Rogers, P., & Hall, A. W. (2003). Effective water governance (Global Water Partnership Technical Committee Background Papers No. 7).
Sardar Shahraki, A., Shahraki, J., & Hashemi Monfared, S. A. (2016). An application of WEAP model in water resources management considering the environmental scenarios and economic value of water. Journal of Water and Irrigation Management, 6(1), 1–14.
Schorr, D. B. (2011). Private rights in publicly-owned water: The pathology of Israeli water law. In S. Bogdanovic (Ed.), Water policy and law in the Mediterranean: An evolving nexus (pp. 179–190). UNESCO.
Shahbakhsh, M., Safdari, A., & Sardar Shahraki, A. (2020). Assessment of modern approach of water governance in the development of water exploitation systems in Sistan and Baluchestan Province. Journal of Water and Irrigation Management, 10(1), 1–15.
Smith, Z. A. (2008). Comparative groundwater management: Findings from an exploratory global survey. Water International, 33(2), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060801970283
Thomas, E., & Godfrey, S. (2018). Water safety plans: Global extensions and developments. IWA Publishing.
United Nations Development Programme. (1997). Governance for sustainable human development. UNDP Policy Document.
United Nations Development Programme. (2013). Water governance in the Arab region: Managing scarcity and securing the future. UNDP Regional Bureau for Arab States.
Valdovinos, J. (2012). The remunicipalization of Parisian water services: New challenges for local authorities and policy implications. Water International, 37(2), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2012.656869
Valeria di Cosmo, L. (2011). The real water consumption behind drinking water: The case of Italy. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(12), 2611–2618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.007
van Rijswick, H. F. M. W., Keessen, A. M., & Freriks, A. A. (2010). The clash of the titans: The relation between the European Water and Medicines Directives. Utrecht Law Review, 6(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.122
Wang-Erlandsson, L., van der Ent, R. J., Gordon, L. J., & Savenije, H. H. G. (2021). Towards a green water planetary boundary. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 3(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-00136-3
Water Policy Group. (2021). Global water policy report 2021: Listening to national water leaders. Water Policy Group. https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/27645
Whitehead, P. G., Wilson, E. J., & Butterfield, D. (1998). A semi-distributed integrated nitrogen model for multiple source assessment in catchments (INCA): Part I—Model structure and process equations. Science of the Total Environment, 210–211, 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(98)00037-0
Wilder, M., & Ingram, H. (2018). Knowing equity when we see it: Water equity in contemporary global contexts. In The Oxford handbook of water politics and policy (pp. 1–20). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199335084.013.22
World Economic Forum. (2018). The global risks report 2018 (13th ed.). World Economic Forum.
World Health Organization. (1991). Environmental health criteria 118: Inorganic mercury. WHO International Programme on Chemical Safety.
Worster, D. (1985). Rivers of empire: Water, aridity, and the growth of the American West. Pantheon Books.
World Wildlife Fund. (2018). Living planet report 2018: Aiming higher. WWF.
Yousefi, H., Mohammadi, A., Mirzaaghabeik, M., & Noorollahi, Y. (2013). Virtual water evaluation for grains products in Iran: Case study: Pea and bean. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 15(6), 1263–1274.
Islamic Republic of Iran. (1983). Law on the fair distribution of water (No. 1983/12/16). Majlis-e Shura-ye Islami.
Ministry of Energy, Islamic Republic of Iran. (2011). National document on water resources development.
Costa Rica. (1995). Ley Orgánica del Ambiente (No. 7554). La Gaceta, No. 195.
Government of India, Ministry of Water Resources. (2012). National water policy 2012.
Republic of South Africa. (1998). National Water Act (No. 36 of 1998). Government Gazette, 398(19182).
United States. (1902). Reclamation Act, ch. 1093, 32 Stat. 388.
Natural Resources Governance
Volume 3, Issue 1 - Serial Number 9
March 2026
Pages 112-134

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics